Understanding Teachers’ Knowledge and Practice of Lower Secondary Geographical Investigations
How Teachers’ Practice of Geographical Investigations (GI) can help teachers
Address gap between teacher knowledge and teacher practice
Suggest how teachers can be supported to better enact GI
Share NIE Humanities and Social Studies Education online resource: Sustainability Learning Lab
Findings from Teachers’ Practice of Geographical Investigations guided the development of
The Sustainability Learning Lab - what is it?
Image 1: Photo credits: Dennis Lee, IN-Learning, NIE (view larger image)
The Sustainability Learning Lab (SLL) is a user-friendly and informative one-stop online portal that supports the Singapore Ministry of Education Geography curriculum.
Developed collaboratively by human and physical geographers, SLL provides public access to:
Image 2: Teachers’ Practice of Geographical Investigations Portal (view larger image)
The SLL online portal also supports real, outdoor learning labs like the NIE Rain Garden and the Jurong Eco Garden.
The Ministry of Education (MOE) Geography curriculum highlights GI as a way to provide students with a means to contextualize and apply geographical knowledge and skills.
The research seeks to deepen students’ learning experience by exploring and understanding links between teacher knowledge and teacher practice in a fieldwork-based context. The research also focuses on water quality because of it being rolled out in the 2014 Singapore syllabus and being used as well in the new 2021 syllabus. Water is also of strategic importance to Singapore.
The research inquiry builds upon the ideas of American educational psychologist Lee S. Shulman who opined that the ‘missing paradigm’ was in the inquiry of how subject matter transformed from the knowledge of the teacher into content of instruction (1986, p.6.).
Figure 1: Shulman's categories of teachers' knowledge ((available for download here ) )
Shulman, L. (1986). Those who understand: knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4-14.
Shulman, L. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: foundation of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1-22.
How was the research carried out?
Using a case study design approach, the research team worked on a sample of four secondary schools and six secondary one Geography teachers.
Findings from lesson observations, curriculum resource analysis, and interviews were then synergized to respond to the following research questions (RQ):
RQ 1: What types of knowledge do secondary school teachers in Singapore have about conducting GI?
RQ 2: How do secondary Geography teachers conduct GI with their students?
RQ 3: What is the influence of teachers’ knowledge on their practice in conducting GI with their students?
Teachers varied in professional dispositions, beliefs, and attitudes about the purpose of GI
Teachers’ appreciation for role of GI in student-led knowledge construction did not always align with practice
Teachers’ practice observed to be highly teacher-directed with time and manpower constraints cited as primary factors
To better enact GI, teachers needed support in
Fostering authentic, student-centred field-based inquiry
Fostering teacher identity relative to field-based inquiry
Exercising reasoning and reflection phases of the inquiry cycle, with regards to the GI framework (MOE, 2014)
To better deliver content on water quality, teachers needed support in:
Developing knowledge of scientific concepts related to water quality
Understanding hydro-social dynamics of fieldwork sites
What does this mean for the professional development of Geography teachers in schools?
Curriculum leaders might need to address teachers’ professional identities during professional development to align teachers’ practice with the desired outcomes of a Geographical education
Teachers’ enactment of GI can be better supported through the provision of professional development and curricular resources that:
Ms Tay Siu Hua, MOE
Ms Chan Hwee Leng, HOD Humanities, AHS, MOE
Ms Agnes Lim, HOD Science, CSS, MOE
Secondary school
Geography
6 teachers
4 secondary schools
Inquiry-Based learning, Field-Based Learning, Character and Citizenship Education & Geography
How findings from Teachers’ Practice of Geographical Investigations can help teachers
The Sustainability Learning Lab – what is it?
Why Teachers’ Practice of Geographical Investigations?
Evidence from Teachers’ Practice of Geographical Investigations?
What does this mean for teacher professional development?
Understanding Teachers’ Knowledge and Practice of Lower Secondary Geographical Investigations
Address gap between teacher knowledge and teacher practice
Suggest how teachers can be supported to better enact GI
Share NIE Humanities and Social Studies Education online resource: Sustainability Learning Lab
Findings from Teachers’ Practice of Geographical Investigations guided the development of:
Image 1: Photo credits: Dennis Lee, IN-Learning, NIE (view larger image)
The Sustainability Learning Lab (SLL) is a user-friendly and informative one-stop online portal that supports the Singapore Ministry of Education Geography curriculum.
Developed collaboratively by human and physical geographers, SLL provides public access to:
Image 2: Teachers’ Practice of Geographical Investigations Portal (view larger image)
The SLL online portal also supports real, outdoor learning labs like the NIE Rain Garden and the Jurong Eco Garden.
The Ministry of Education (MOE) Geography curriculum highlights GI as a way to provide students with a means to contextualize and apply geographical knowledge and skills.
The research seeks to deepen students’ learning experience by exploring and understanding links between teacher knowledge and teacher practice in a fieldwork-based context. The research also focuses on water quality because of it being rolled out in the 2014 Singapore syllabus and being used as well in the new 2021 syllabus. Water is also of strategic importance to Singapore.
The research inquiry builds upon the ideas of American educational psychologist Lee S. Shulman who opined that the ‘missing paradigm’ was in the inquiry of how subject matter transformed from the knowledge of the teacher into content of instruction (1986, p.6.).
Figure 1: Shulman's categories of teachers' knowledge (available for download here )
Shulman, L. (1986). Those who understand: knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4-14.
Shulman, L. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: foundation of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1-22.
How was the Research Carried Out?
Using a case study design approach, the research team worked on a sample of four secondary schools and six secondary one Geography teachers.
Findings from lesson observations, curriculum resource analysis, and interviews were then synergized to respond to the following research questions (RQ):
Teachers’ practice observed to be highly teacher-directed with time and manpower constraints cited as primary factors
Fostering authentic, student-centred field-based inquiry
Fostering teacher identity relative to field-based inquiry
Conducting reconnaissance of fieldwork sites for GI
Exercising reasoning and reflection phases of the inquiry cycle, with regards to the GI framework (MOE, 2014)
Developing knowledge of scientific concepts related to water quality
Understanding hydro-social dynamics of fieldwork sites
Support more student-directed inquiry
Support teachers’ knowledge about the scientific concept of water quality GI and address issue of place-based knowledge with regard to the fieldwork sites
To learn more about this research, please contact Principal Investigator Dr Tricia Seow at tricia.seow@nie.edu.sg.
The following project is associated with GI Research:
ERFP-Funded Example
Author Credit Example:
Secondary school
Geography
6 teachers
4 secondary schools
Inquiry-Based learning, Field-Based Learning, Character and Citizenship Education & Geography